Creatrix Tiara: "Person of color" = someone discriminated against for their race/ethnicity on a systematic level by the white majority

guerrillamamamedicine:

downlo:

(Inspired by the commentary on this post)

For the purposes of anti-racism struggles, that’s all you need to go by.

Yes, the term, “colored” is not normally associated with Asian people these days, but it was definitely used to label people of Asian descent in this country in the…

while i am really interested in the history of asians and asian-americans, especially the history of resistance to colonization, i find this post to be problematic. 

especially this analysis:

So if White is grudgingly treating you OK, while Black and Brown seem to hate and distrust you, then whom do you ally yourself with? More importantly, who benefits from this apparent alliance?

In the American black-white paradigm of race relations, ‘others’ like Asians get shit on no matter which side we’re on. So the Asian internalization of White racism makes a twisted kind of sense as a survival strategy, particularly if your natural allies (other victims of White racism) are treating you like foreigners and even equating you with the oppressor himself. 

My point: Asians’ conflicted, sometimes tense, relations with African Americans and those who have been historically, categorically considered ‘Colored’ is an artifact of White racism. This means that if you exclude Asians from ‘Colored’ solidarity against White racism, you are reproducing a highly successful strategy of White racism.

my response to this is from here:  nopper

and here is an excerpt that i think complicates your analysis…

Contrary to the popular image of blacks as racially restrictive, Yancey discovers that black respondents are the most open to all other races.  Yet despite being the most receptive to other groups, blacks in general are rejected by all nonblack groups – whites, Latino/as and Asian Americans.  While some assume that whites will be closed off to anyone not white, Yancey’s research show that white respondents are more accepting of Latino/as and Asian Americans than they are of blacks.  In turn, Latino/a and Asian American respondents are fairly receptive to one another as well as whites.  Overall, Yancey’s findings reveal that whites, Latino/as and Asian Americans do not tend to reject one another as possible neighbors or their kids’ spouses, but all three groups show a general resistance to blacks in these social roles. 

That all three nonblack groups were found to be more accepting of one another in a way that they were not of blacks suggests that assimilation may be less about desiring whiteness as it is avoiding blackness. Yancey concludes, “The rejection of African Americans, rather than the acceptance of European Americans, is the best explanation of social distance in the United States.”

so while i realize that you were responding to a specific post in which it was questioned whether or not asians are considered people of color.  (which may have simply been a question of whether or not asians consider themselves to be people of color) the research shows that it is not, in general, blacks rejecting asians as it is asians engaging in anti-blackness. 

“Previous research on majority group domination tends to be built upon either the concept that white supremacy is, or was, the dominant ideology among majority group members, or the concept that dominant group members utilize notions of color blindness to protect their racial position of privilege.  Both concepts lead to an understanding of an American racial hierarchy formed by a white/nonwhite dichotomy.  In such a system all non-European groups face social rejection and theoretically all non-European groups deserve an equal amount of academic attention – even if they have not been receiving it.  Yet given the merging of nonblack racial minorities into the dominant culture, this white/nonwhite dichotomy is losing relevance.  A black/nonblack dichotomy produces more understanding about contemporary race relations.  It suggests that the informal rejection of African Americans, rather than a tendency by the majority to oppress all minority groups in a roughly equal manner, is the linchpin to the American contemporary racial hierarchy.”

so yeah, i dont think that blacks and asians are ‘natural allies’.

on a personal note, the only racialized people in the states, that i have talked to who strongly reject being called a poc, were asians/asian americans.  i used to do a lot of anti racism trainings, so ive had this convo an above average amount of times. 

with love. 

very important commentary.

(via blackraincloud)

1 year ago  #race #racism #anti-asian racism #anti-racism #activism #resistance #politics #history #law #government #asian americans #chinese exclusion acts #wwii #japanese interment #lynching #xenophobia #yellow peril #model minority #huey p. newton #protest #stereotypes #amy chua #internalization #vincent chin #wen ho lee #allies #imperialism #intersectionality #wall of text #orientalism  485 notes

UK citizen? Please sign this gov't e-petition to withdraw the NHS privatisation/"reform" bill!

lucypaw:

acfiber:

damnyoursympathy:

neon-loneliness:

apiphile:

fuckyeahgenderstudies:

Pretty please.

strongly certain nothing will have any effect and everything will be terrible forever, but sign this anyway

when there’s nothing left to lose, right? UK people activate!

Uk citizen here.

The nhs is institutionally transphobic and maintains policies which discriminate against and deny care to trans patients.

They can burn to death and drown for all I care.

Which demonstrates what the statutory duty of the Secretary of State for health to “secure and provide comprehensive health care for all” really means.

Also, do you think the so-called ‘free market’ is going to be any less transphobic?  Especially when trans people don’t tend to be people with lots of money?

1 year ago  #transphobia #politics  63 notes

Arizona To Charge People To See Incarcerated Family And Friends

strugglingtobeheard:

so-treu:

leonineantiheroine:

fivelettered:

The Arizona legislature has passed legislation that will now allow prisons to charge $25 for people to visit their family and friends in prison. It is a remarkably cruel law since many of these visitors are coming from low income families and have to travel great distances. Yet, legislators are pointing out that they originally wanted to charge babies and children as well but decided to be nice guys.

 
The fee is being justified as a one-time “background check fee” for visitors, but staffers admit that it is an effort to increase revenue at the expense of these families. Wendy Baldo, chief of staff for the Arizona Senate, confirmed that they “were trying to cut the budget and think of ways that could help get some services for the Department of Corrections.”

Prison visitation has an extremely positive impact on inmates both psychologically and socially. It maintains and strengthens family bonds that will be needed to keep them from recidivism and can weaken the hold of gangs and other bad influences. Now the state is going to tell tell families on assistance that in order to see their loved ones, each adult will have to fork over $25. The article below also details how people have had difficulty paying the fee in advance. Visiting a loved one can be a terribly traumatic experience for a family. Yet, Arizona will now be there to get its cut.

As someone who has worked in prisons for decades, I find this absolutely appalling. From the beginning of correctional systems, the one right that virtually all societies have afforded inmates has been visitation. To now charge for the right to visit is gratuitous and cruel.

No gif can express my distaste.

WHOA

WTF is going on with Arizona?

i dont why why im still shocked, but i am.

No. That is the most fucked up thing I’ve read today. The classist racist bullshit in this idea is so fucking jacked up, I can’t even believe it. Hey, we arrested you for criminal activity we are responsible like drugs and guns all in this country and then we charge you to eat, to be entertained, to talk to your family on the phone, and now just so a kid can see his father, a child their mother, a brother see their brother, what the fuck? This is just… sick.

(Source: letterstomycountry)

1 year ago  #politics #criminal law #criminal justice #arizona #prisons #fuckery #what the hell #no  401 notes
"[Their issues are] anti-abortion, anti-gay rights — but they also have … the belief that government should not be involved in social safety nets, that the country is becoming socialist, if not communist. … — All of what we’ve come to call ‘Tea Party issues’ of very small government. In the case of the Apostles, they believe this because they believe that a large government that handles the safety net is taking away what is the domain of the Church and of Christianity."

A new Christian movement that seeks to take dominion over politics, business and culture in preparation for the end times and Jesus’s return, is becoming more of a presence in American politics. On today’s Fresh Air, Rachel Tabachnick, who researches the religious right, explains its beliefs and influences. (via nprfreshair)

I can’t believe that this never occurred to me before, the idea that much of the religious right is against social programs because it prevents the poor from becoming dependant on the church and thus reduces the church’s power over the lives of the poor.  Oh my god. 

 This is me recoiling in horror.

(via morninggloria)

That’s why conservative Christians are always arguing that they’d rather give to charity through their church than by paying taxes. 

(via tehblackbird)

This is me, throwing up in my mouth.

(via wtfox-)

fuck.

(via squeetothegee-deactivated201111)

1 year ago  #reblog #politics #Christianity #Tea Party  433 notes
docshoe:

I briefly took part in the protests at the San Francisco Civic Center BART Station this afternoon, and I’m a little frightened.  Not because of behavior of the protesters, who were very peaceful, but because of the way San Francisco cracked down on the protest.
For those of you who aren’t familiar with the story: BART police have been embroiled in a scandal recently over their curious habit of shooting unarmed commuters.  You remember reading about those riots in Oakland last year?  Same thing.  Anyhow, a few weeks back some people tried to protest at a BART station, and BART shut down cell phone service in that area to suppress communication.
Imagine if you were stuck underground, in one of those trains that were stopped, and you had a medical emergency.  Imagine one of your children was in that station, and you couldn’t reach her.  Imagine you were just some idealistic college kid who wanted to take part in local politics by peacefully demonstrating, and suddenly you find that you and your friends have all suddenly lost cell-phone reception—just as the cops, those same cops who have been accused of shooting unarmed people, are gathering outside…
You can see how this is a big deal, right?
These weren’t rioters.  Nobody was hurt.  Would it have been so hard for one of our political leaders to come to the BART station and speak to the people, and hear their concerns?  Would it have killed BART to send one of their directors, to let the people know that their grievance is being taken seriously?  Would that be too much to ask?
Apparently so.  Hunter Thompson once said that peaceful protests are an act of faith in the Democratic system; to protest, you must believe that the Powers That Be care what you think, and that perhaps they might change their minds if only you and others like you make yourselves heard.  That’s the idea, anyhow.  But the Powers That Be in San Francisco just won’t listen.  They chose to shut down communications and send in the police.  They didn’t give a rat’s ass what the people had to say.
So, yeah, we were entirely justified in protesting today.
I should have known something was up today.  I took the train to work in the morning and home in the afternoon, and both times there were multiple BART cops on board, checking everyone’s receipts.  It made me wonder how the protest would turn out.  What would we do?  What would the cops do?
My friend Zeia and I were free this afternoon—I work part-time, and Zeia has the week off school.  We hopped on the Muni and rode down to Civic Center.  We got there just a little after five, when the protest was supposed to start.  We were all kinds of eager.
And guess what? We saw maybe eight protesters.  They were just standing around, handing out flyers.  A few of them were wearing those Guy Fawkes masks—you know, like the guy in V For Vendetta?  Seven, maybe eight people demonstrating peacefully upstairs, and one guy down on the platform playing a recorded message over a loudspeaker that was turned down to an unobtrusive volume.  Hell, it wasn’t just peaceful—this protest was boring. 
I was disappointed so few people had shown up, and—well, I might as well be honest: I am an immature jerk, and even though I care about local politics I have to admit that I’m easily bored.  So after sticking around for a few minutes, Zeia and I headed down to the record store to hang out a while.  And we got out of the Civic Center just in time, before the hammer came down.
The message came over the loudspeakers just as we were leaving.  The City was shutting down every station from Van Ness to Embarcadero.  They ordered the protesters—and this was just eight boring guys, mind you—they ordered them to leave, and they brought down the gates.  They brought down the gates at every BART station, and had every possible entrance and exit guarded by police. 
I saw eight protesters today.  But I saw at least sixty, maybe seventy cops.  And a couple news-vans.  And a few journalists on foot with their cameras, including one cameraman who scowled and wouldn’t believe me when I told him it was just eight guys.  I saw police helicopters hovering overhead.  Do you have any idea how expensive it is to use one of those helicopters?  All told, the police action taken by the City of San Francisco must have cost tens of thousands of dollars at the very least.
To stop eight guys.  Eight very civil, very boring guys, with an honest grievance and a constitutional right to peacefully protest.  They brought the hammer down to stop a handful of geeks in Halloween masks.
Bear in mind, there were very few people at that protest.  There weren’t even very many commuters, most of them having been forewarned of the protest by the morning paper.  They figured the trains might be stopped, just like last time, so they avoided the Civic Center BART Station altogether.  Most people never had a chance to see what I saw.
My point being, there weren’t many witnesses.  And for those of you who weren’t actually at the protest, well, if you had to judge what it was like by what you saw outside the station, you’d assume there was a full-scale riot underway, wouldn’t you?
The Media will not disillusion you.  I’m writing this note only a few hours after the fact, and thus far I’ve only found one paper that has posted a story about the protests, and it’s in Boston.  Anyhow, here’s what they have to say:

Cellphone  service was operating Monday night as an estimated 50 protesters  gathered on the Civic Center Station platform chanting “no justice, no  peace” shortly after 5 p.m. Thirty minutes later, police in riot gear  and wielding batons closed the station and cleared the platform after  protesters briefly delayed an east-bound train from departing.


From  Civic Center, the protesters were joined by more demonstrators and  marched down San Francisco’s Market Street and attempted to enter to  more stations. Officials closed those stations as well.
“Once  the platform becomes unsafe, we can’t jeopardize the safety of patrons  and employees,” BART Deputy Police Chief Dan Hartwig said.


Hundreds  of people stood on the sidewalks and streets outside stations in the  city’s Financial District on Monday evening. Many of the people appeared  to be commuters.

Did they say fifty protesters?  What’s this about the platform becoming unsafe?  What kind of bullshit is this?  I was there at five, and I did not see any news cameras.  I did, however, see a lot of news vans rolling down Market Street around six o’clock, after the stations were already shut down.  Is it possible that whoever wrote this has no idea what he’s talking about?  Is he just making this shit up, or is he repeating a lie the cops told him?
Either way, the most boring protest I’ve ever taken part in has been made to look like a bloody riot. 
After two deployments to Iraq, I’ve had a lot of time to ponder the ways the government and the media can manipulate the public perception of any event—by withholding information, by telling half-truths, and sometimes by outright lying.  While I’d love to believe that what happened today was just an innocent overreaction on the part of the City, experience tells me that mistakes this big are never made by accident.  Somebody wanted a massive police crackdown on this pitiful little protest.  Somebody wanted it to look like the situation was far more dire than it really was.
The question is, why?
I want you to pay attention to the news.  In the days and weeks ahead, our city officials will be full of bright ideas about how to deal with this sort of “public menace.”  I want you to closely scrutinize these bright ideas our Fearless Leaders propose, and ask yourself: Is this proposal really justified?  Or are our politicians just using the protests—the protests which have been blown completely out of proportion, I remind you—to justify their own political agenda?
We have to be very careful now.
Keep on rockin’ in the not-so-free world, folks—
Doc Shoe
PS: If you live in the Bay Area, I’d appreciate it if you reblogged this post.  The media is already telling lies about what happened, and I want people to know the truth.  Also, if you were at that protest, I’d love to hear your thoughts.  What did you see?  What do you make of it?  Just drop me a message.

docshoe:

I briefly took part in the protests at the San Francisco Civic Center BART Station this afternoon, and I’m a little frightened.  Not because of behavior of the protesters, who were very peaceful, but because of the way San Francisco cracked down on the protest.

For those of you who aren’t familiar with the story: BART police have been embroiled in a scandal recently over their curious habit of shooting unarmed commuters.  You remember reading about those riots in Oakland last year?  Same thing.  Anyhow, a few weeks back some people tried to protest at a BART station, and BART shut down cell phone service in that area to suppress communication.

Imagine if you were stuck underground, in one of those trains that were stopped, and you had a medical emergency.  Imagine one of your children was in that station, and you couldn’t reach her.  Imagine you were just some idealistic college kid who wanted to take part in local politics by peacefully demonstrating, and suddenly you find that you and your friends have all suddenly lost cell-phone reception—just as the cops, those same cops who have been accused of shooting unarmed people, are gathering outside

You can see how this is a big deal, right?

These weren’t rioters.  Nobody was hurt.  Would it have been so hard for one of our political leaders to come to the BART station and speak to the people, and hear their concerns?  Would it have killed BART to send one of their directors, to let the people know that their grievance is being taken seriously?  Would that be too much to ask?

Apparently so.  Hunter Thompson once said that peaceful protests are an act of faith in the Democratic system; to protest, you must believe that the Powers That Be care what you think, and that perhaps they might change their minds if only you and others like you make yourselves heard.  That’s the idea, anyhow.  But the Powers That Be in San Francisco just won’t listen.  They chose to shut down communications and send in the police.  They didn’t give a rat’s ass what the people had to say.

So, yeah, we were entirely justified in protesting today.

I should have known something was up today.  I took the train to work in the morning and home in the afternoon, and both times there were multiple BART cops on board, checking everyone’s receipts.  It made me wonder how the protest would turn out.  What would we do?  What would the cops do?

My friend Zeia and I were free this afternoon—I work part-time, and Zeia has the week off school.  We hopped on the Muni and rode down to Civic Center.  We got there just a little after five, when the protest was supposed to start.  We were all kinds of eager.

And guess what? We saw maybe eight protesters.  They were just standing around, handing out flyers.  A few of them were wearing those Guy Fawkes masks—you know, like the guy in V For Vendetta?  Seven, maybe eight people demonstrating peacefully upstairs, and one guy down on the platform playing a recorded message over a loudspeaker that was turned down to an unobtrusive volume.  Hell, it wasn’t just peaceful—this protest was boring

I was disappointed so few people had shown up, and—well, I might as well be honest: I am an immature jerk, and even though I care about local politics I have to admit that I’m easily bored.  So after sticking around for a few minutes, Zeia and I headed down to the record store to hang out a while.  And we got out of the Civic Center just in time, before the hammer came down.

The message came over the loudspeakers just as we were leaving.  The City was shutting down every station from Van Ness to Embarcadero.  They ordered the protesters—and this was just eight boring guys, mind you—they ordered them to leave, and they brought down the gates.  They brought down the gates at every BART station, and had every possible entrance and exit guarded by police. 

I saw eight protesters today.  But I saw at least sixty, maybe seventy cops.  And a couple news-vans.  And a few journalists on foot with their cameras, including one cameraman who scowled and wouldn’t believe me when I told him it was just eight guys.  I saw police helicopters hovering overhead.  Do you have any idea how expensive it is to use one of those helicopters?  All told, the police action taken by the City of San Francisco must have cost tens of thousands of dollars at the very least.

To stop eight guys.  Eight very civil, very boring guys, with an honest grievance and a constitutional right to peacefully protest.  They brought the hammer down to stop a handful of geeks in Halloween masks.

Bear in mind, there were very few people at that protest.  There weren’t even very many commuters, most of them having been forewarned of the protest by the morning paper.  They figured the trains might be stopped, just like last time, so they avoided the Civic Center BART Station altogether.  Most people never had a chance to see what I saw.

My point being, there weren’t many witnesses.  And for those of you who weren’t actually at the protest, well, if you had to judge what it was like by what you saw outside the station, you’d assume there was a full-scale riot underway, wouldn’t you?

The Media will not disillusion you.  I’m writing this note only a few hours after the fact, and thus far I’ve only found one paper that has posted a story about the protests, and it’s in Boston.  Anyhow, here’s what they have to say:

Cellphone service was operating Monday night as an estimated 50 protesters gathered on the Civic Center Station platform chanting “no justice, no peace” shortly after 5 p.m. Thirty minutes later, police in riot gear and wielding batons closed the station and cleared the platform after protesters briefly delayed an east-bound train from departing.

From Civic Center, the protesters were joined by more demonstrators and marched down San Francisco’s Market Street and attempted to enter to more stations. Officials closed those stations as well.

“Once the platform becomes unsafe, we can’t jeopardize the safety of patrons and employees,” BART Deputy Police Chief Dan Hartwig said.

Hundreds of people stood on the sidewalks and streets outside stations in the city’s Financial District on Monday evening. Many of the people appeared to be commuters.

Did they say fifty protesters?  What’s this about the platform becoming unsafe?  What kind of bullshit is this?  I was there at five, and I did not see any news cameras.  I did, however, see a lot of news vans rolling down Market Street around six o’clock, after the stations were already shut down.  Is it possible that whoever wrote this has no idea what he’s talking about?  Is he just making this shit up, or is he repeating a lie the cops told him?

Either way, the most boring protest I’ve ever taken part in has been made to look like a bloody riot. 

After two deployments to Iraq, I’ve had a lot of time to ponder the ways the government and the media can manipulate the public perception of any event—by withholding information, by telling half-truths, and sometimes by outright lying.  While I’d love to believe that what happened today was just an innocent overreaction on the part of the City, experience tells me that mistakes this big are never made by accident.  Somebody wanted a massive police crackdown on this pitiful little protest.  Somebody wanted it to look like the situation was far more dire than it really was.

The question is, why?

I want you to pay attention to the news.  In the days and weeks ahead, our city officials will be full of bright ideas about how to deal with this sort of “public menace.”  I want you to closely scrutinize these bright ideas our Fearless Leaders propose, and ask yourself: Is this proposal really justified?  Or are our politicians just using the protests—the protests which have been blown completely out of proportion, I remind you—to justify their own political agenda?

We have to be very careful now.

Keep on rockin’ in the not-so-free world, folks—

Doc Shoe

PS: If you live in the Bay Area, I’d appreciate it if you reblogged this post.  The media is already telling lies about what happened, and I want people to know the truth.  Also, if you were at that protest, I’d love to hear your thoughts.  What did you see?  What do you make of it?  Just drop me a message.

(via strugglingtobeheard)

1 year ago  #Anonymous #Politics #Protest #San Francisco #BART  561 notes
"To wit, 44 percent of Social Security recipients, 41 percent of military veterans, 43 percent of unemployment recipients, 40 percent of Medicare recipients, 43 percent of college Pell Grant recipients and 27 percent of welfare recipients all said they had never used a government social program."
1 year ago  #politics #government programs #fallacies  181 notes
"The issues that face African-American women were not kind of Real Housewives of Jackson, Mississippi, Mean Girls behavior. That’s not what it was. It was rape. It was lynching. It was the burning of communities. What this movie does, in 2011, is it completes the work that happened and started in 1923 when the Daughters of the American Confederacy, along with Sen John Williams from Mississippi, found money in the federal budget to erect a granite statue of Mammy in the shadow of the Lincoln Memorial, which had just been dedicated in 1922. This is the same Senate that refused to pass the Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill. In other words, a Senate that allowed black men to be lynched without federal oversight, but had the time to pass a bill that said we could erect a statue to Mammy. Now this is not granite and it’s not on federal land, but it is the same notion that the fidelity of black women domestics is more important than the realities of the lives and the pain, the anguish, the rape, the lynching that they experienced. And for that reason, it’s not artistic, it’s ahistorical. And it’s deeply troubling."
— Melissa Harris-Perry, talking about the messages in the new movie The Help on Lawrence O’Donnell’s show last night. Watch the full clip here. (via thepoliticalnotebook)

Yes!!!

(via blackamazon)

(Source: feministing.com, via blackamazon)

1 year ago  #The Help #feminism #film #politics #pop culture #racism  442 notes
str8nochaser:

drinkthe-koolaid:

cognitivedissonance:

Recently, The Heritage Foundation released a report on poverty in American, largely trying to debunk the idea that poor people are poor. They included facts like the majority of people living in poverty have refrigerators, microwaves, and air conditioners. Never mind these things might be attached to a rental unit of some kind… it’s not like those items listed are big-ticket items, particularly when bought used. 
I met a family the other day who, according to the Heritage Foundation, is living in the lap of luxury. I’ll let you folks make up your minds. 
I was at the Salvation Army last week and was looking at the appliances. There was an older microwave for $5. A woman in front of me (I’ll call her Ann) at the register bought the microwave and was telling her kids they’d get microwave popcorn again. It looked like that $5 microwave made those kids’ day. Now, that microwave would have been included in The Heritage Foundation’s analysis because she also receives WIC, and Heritage Foundation is especially interested in those receiving federal benefits.
I know she receives WIC, because she asked me if all the grocery stores in town took it. Ann just moved here about three weeks ago and was staying with a friend who was now in the process of moving away. I talked to her for about half an hour outside the store. She asked if I knew which hotel was the cheapest and cleanest, because she couldn’t afford the rent here (college is about to start, so the cheapest rentals are gone) and she’s on a list for a housing voucher.
I helped her put a suitcase on a luggage rack on the top of her car to make room for the microwave in her trunk. She mentioned she was glad to have a place to work and, she hoped, a place to live. I asked where she moved from. She said Denver, and that she and her kids were living in their car for a few months (in the midst of a heat wave) because her landlord kicked her out and she had nowhere to go. Ann said she never signed a lease and the landlord evicted her with just a few hours notice because her two-year-old was too noisy. She was afraid to go for DFS for help because she thought they’d take the kids, what with them living in the car. She interviewed for a job at a fast food place here about a week ago and starts this Monday. She’d been out of work for about 5 months when she moved up here.
I gave her the phone numbers for every community resource I could think of, pointed her towards the hotels I knew were cheap and clean, and offered to help in any way I could. Ann said that I’d helped, that she already knew how to get along the best she could, and that “being poor takes skills you don’t know you have ‘til you need them.”
But according to Heritage Foundation, she’s not poor. She and her 3 kids are living in a hotel here that has a fridge, a queen bed (or two), a $5 microwave she bought, and she’s living in the lap of luxury (as defined by them)? I don’t think so. Their report exemplifies what I (and others) call “Poor people can’t have nice things.” Basically, if you have a very basic amenity, like a microwave, you’re obviously not poor. Apparently, being poor involves some kind of “noble suffering” and if you aren’t suffering Oliver Twist-style, you aren’t poor. 
I can see Ann and her kids were struggling. But that’s seemingly not “low” enough for folks at the Heritage Foundation. I don’t care what “amenities” people in poverty supposedly have - to me, one person being one paycheck away from homelessness or food insecurity is one too many. One in seven Americans currently rely on food stamps to eat. And never mind those folks trying to subsist on the goodwill of others and/or unemployment. I’m not going to quibble about a cell phone or a television. 
I hope she’s doing alright, the job works out, and the kids get microwave popcorn.

I get this shit all the time. I am poor and on unemployment. Some people would be aghast to find out that I have internet and a smartphone, but in today’s world (and the industry I am currently unemployed from) those things are not luxuries, but necessities.
As a side note, does anyone else ever notice that these right wing groups always pick innocuous-sounding names? “Focus on the Family”, “Heritage Foundation”, etc. George Orwell must be rolling in his grave.

I swearfolawd these people think that “poor” = less than human/not worthy of decent life. Its the same reason they are so incensed about EVERYONE having access to something basic like affordable health care. The NERVE of these poor people wanting to be able to see doctors and get treated. How DARE they?
They make me sick.

str8nochaser:

drinkthe-koolaid:

cognitivedissonance:

Recently, The Heritage Foundation released a report on poverty in American, largely trying to debunk the idea that poor people are poor. They included facts like the majority of people living in poverty have refrigerators, microwaves, and air conditioners. Never mind these things might be attached to a rental unit of some kind… it’s not like those items listed are big-ticket items, particularly when bought used. 

I met a family the other day who, according to the Heritage Foundation, is living in the lap of luxury. I’ll let you folks make up your minds. 

I was at the Salvation Army last week and was looking at the appliances. There was an older microwave for $5. A woman in front of me (I’ll call her Ann) at the register bought the microwave and was telling her kids they’d get microwave popcorn again. It looked like that $5 microwave made those kids’ day. Now, that microwave would have been included in The Heritage Foundation’s analysis because she also receives WIC, and Heritage Foundation is especially interested in those receiving federal benefits.

I know she receives WIC, because she asked me if all the grocery stores in town took it. Ann just moved here about three weeks ago and was staying with a friend who was now in the process of moving away. I talked to her for about half an hour outside the store. She asked if I knew which hotel was the cheapest and cleanest, because she couldn’t afford the rent here (college is about to start, so the cheapest rentals are gone) and she’s on a list for a housing voucher.

I helped her put a suitcase on a luggage rack on the top of her car to make room for the microwave in her trunk. She mentioned she was glad to have a place to work and, she hoped, a place to live. I asked where she moved from. She said Denver, and that she and her kids were living in their car for a few months (in the midst of a heat wave) because her landlord kicked her out and she had nowhere to go. Ann said she never signed a lease and the landlord evicted her with just a few hours notice because her two-year-old was too noisy. She was afraid to go for DFS for help because she thought they’d take the kids, what with them living in the car. She interviewed for a job at a fast food place here about a week ago and starts this Monday. She’d been out of work for about 5 months when she moved up here.

I gave her the phone numbers for every community resource I could think of, pointed her towards the hotels I knew were cheap and clean, and offered to help in any way I could. Ann said that I’d helped, that she already knew how to get along the best she could, and that “being poor takes skills you don’t know you have ‘til you need them.”

But according to Heritage Foundation, she’s not poor. She and her 3 kids are living in a hotel here that has a fridge, a queen bed (or two), a $5 microwave she bought, and she’s living in the lap of luxury (as defined by them)? I don’t think so. Their report exemplifies what I (and others) call “Poor people can’t have nice things.” Basically, if you have a very basic amenity, like a microwave, you’re obviously not poor. Apparently, being poor involves some kind of “noble suffering” and if you aren’t suffering Oliver Twist-style, you aren’t poor. 

I can see Ann and her kids were struggling. But that’s seemingly not “low” enough for folks at the Heritage Foundation. I don’t care what “amenities” people in poverty supposedly have - to me, one person being one paycheck away from homelessness or food insecurity is one too many. One in seven Americans currently rely on food stamps to eat. And never mind those folks trying to subsist on the goodwill of others and/or unemployment. I’m not going to quibble about a cell phone or a television. 

I hope she’s doing alright, the job works out, and the kids get microwave popcorn.

I get this shit all the time. I am poor and on unemployment. Some people would be aghast to find out that I have internet and a smartphone, but in today’s world (and the industry I am currently unemployed from) those things are not luxuries, but necessities.

As a side note, does anyone else ever notice that these right wing groups always pick innocuous-sounding names? “Focus on the Family”, “Heritage Foundation”, etc. George Orwell must be rolling in his grave.

I swearfolawd these people think that “poor” = less than human/not worthy of decent life. Its the same reason they are so incensed about EVERYONE having access to something basic like affordable health care. The NERVE of these poor people wanting to be able to see doctors and get treated. How DARE they?

They make me sick.

1 year ago  #poverty #politics #inequality #semantics #doublethink  1,101 notes
whiporwill:

New GOP strategy involves reelecting Obama, making his life even more miserable

According to GOP sources, the decision to cede the 2012 election to Obama came after rank-and-file Republicans agreed that grinding the president down to nothing and pushing him to the brink of insanity was far more in line with the Republican Party’s core principles than actually controlling the White House, making laws, or governing the country.

whiporwill:

New GOP strategy involves reelecting Obama, making his life even more miserable

According to GOP sources, the decision to cede the 2012 election to Obama came after rank-and-file Republicans agreed that grinding the president down to nothing and pushing him to the brink of insanity was far more in line with the Republican Party’s core principles than actually controlling the White House, making laws, or governing the country.

(via roropcoldchain)

1 year ago  #the onion #politics #obama #GOP #satire  67 notes